- United Nations. Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. Available online https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/ Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2022).
- United Nations. Analysis and Policy Recommendations from the United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Group on Sustainable Transport, Mobilizing Sustainable Transport for Development High-level Advisory Group on Sustainable Transport. 2016.
- Thondoo, M.; Marquet, O.; Márquez, S.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Small Cities, Big Needs: Urban Transport Planning in Cities of Developing Countries. J. Transp. Health 2020, 19, 100944.
- Shirazi H. (2020). [Review of Public Transportation Policies in Tehran, Necessity of an Integrated Policy Package (Persian)]. Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 10(37), 336-359.
- Lai, C.M.T.; Cole, A. Measuring Progress of Smart Cities: Indexing the Smart City Indices. Urban Gov. 2022, S2664328622000699, in press.
- Burkhardt, J. Limitations of mass transportation and individual vehicle systems for older persons. In Mobility and Transportation in the Elderly; Schaie, K.W., Pietrucha, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 97–124.
- Cheng-Min, F. New prospects of transportation mobility. IATSS Res. 2014, 38, 22–26.
- Okraszewska, R.; Romanowska, A.; Wołek, M.; Oskarbski, J.; Birr, K.; Jamroz, K. Integration of a multilevel transport system model into sustainable urban mobility planning. Sustainability 2018, 10, 479.
- Kamargianni, M.; Li, W.; Matyas, M.; Schäfer, A. A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 14, 3294–3303.
- OECD, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Competition Committee, Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation. Taxi, Ride-Sourcing and Ride-Sharing Services. Available online: https://One.Oecd.Org/Document/DAF/COMP/ WP2(2018)1/En/Pdf (accessed on 13 May 2022).
- Jung, J.; Koo, Y. Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions. Sustainability 2018, 10, 539.
- Savastano, M.; Suciu, M.-C.; Gorelova, I.; Stativă, G.-A. How Smart Is Mobility in Smart Cities? An Analysis of Citizens’ Value Perceptions through ICT Applications. Cities 2023, 132, 104071.
- Savastano, M.; Suciu, M.-C.; Gorelova, I.; Stativă, G.-A. How Smart Is Mobility in Smart Cities? An Analysis of Citizens’ Value Perceptions through ICT Applications. Cities 2023, 132, 104071.
- Harms, S.; Truffer, B. The Emergence of a Nationwide Carsharing Co-Operative in Switzerland, Research Report; EAWAG: Niemcy, Germany, 1998.
- Gonzalez, P.P.; Quadros, R. Digital Transformation and New Business Models in Urban Mobility: The Case of Carsharing in Brazil. In 2022 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET); IEEE: Portland, OR, USA, 2022; pp. 1–12.
- Research and Markets. Car Sharing Market: Global Industry, Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2021–2026.
- Finger, M.; Bert, N.; Kupfer, D.; Montero, J.J.; Wołek, M. Research for TRAN Committee: Infrastructure Funding Challenges in the Sharing Economy; European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies: Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
- Here Portal. A Car Shared Removes 17 Private Vehicles from the Road! Available online: https://www.here.com/learn/blog/ car-sharing-effectively-removes-17-privately-owned-vehicles-road (accessed on 15 October 2022).
- Turo ´n, K. Social Barriers and Transportation Social Exclusion Issues in Creating Sustainable Car-Sharing Systems. JESI 2021, 9, 10–22.
- Abouee-Mehrizi, H.; Baron, O.; Berman, O.; Chen, D. Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Car Sharing Market. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2021, 30, 190–209.
- Julsrud, T.E.; Standal, K. Developing B2B Electric Car Sharing as a Sustainable Mode of Work Travels. A Community-Based Affordances Perspective. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 2022, 16, 1–12.
- Litman, T. Not So Fast Better Speed Valuation for Transportation Planning. Available online: https://www.vtpi.org/nsf.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2024).
- Schaefer, C.; Stelter, A.; Holl-Supra, S.; Weber, S.; Niehaves, B. The Acceptance and Use Behavior of Shared Mobility Services in a Rural Municipality. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 1229–1240.
- Shokouhyar, S.; Shokoohyar, S.; Sobhani, A.; Gorizi, A.J. Shared Mobility in Post-COVID Era: New Challenges and Opportunities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 67, 102714.
- Böcker, L.; Meelen, T. Sharing for People, Planet or Profit? Analysing Motivations for Intended Sharing Economy Participation. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 23, 28–39.
- Deloitte. The Sharing Economy: Share and Make Money: How Does Switzerland Compare? Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ch/Documents/consumer-business/ch-cb-shared-economy-share-and-make-money.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Smith, A. Shared, Collaborative and on Demand: The New Digital Economy. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/ internet/2016/05/19/the-new-digital-economy/ (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Szymkowiak, A.; Zelichowska, E. Factors Affecting Car-Sharing and Participation in the Sharing Economy. ˙ Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sect. H–Oeconomia 2019, 53, 99.
- Jie, F.; Standing, C.; Biermann, S.; Standing, S.; Le, T. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Shared Mobility Systems: Evidence from Australia. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2021, 41, 100651.
- Nicholas, M.; Rajon Bernard, M. Success Factors for Electric Carsharing. Available online: https://theicct.org/wp-content/ uploads/2021/12/na-us-eu-ldv-electric-carsharing-factors-aug21_0.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2023).
- Alzahrani, S.; Alzahrani, A.; Dai, X.; Hsu, W.-C.; Tiwari, R. An Assessment of the Factors Influencing the Selection of the Best Carsharing Alternative in Portland Area Using Hierarchical Decision Modeling (HDM). In Proceedings of the 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, OR, USA, 25–29 August 2019; IEEE: Portland, OR, USA, 2019; pp. 1–7.
- Hahn, R.; Ostertag, F.; Lehr, A.; Büttgen, M.; Benoit, S. “I like It, but I Don’t Use It”: Impact of Carsharing Business Models on Usage Intentions in the Sharing Economy. Bus. Strat. Env. 2020, 29, 1404–1418.
- Caulfield, B.; Kehoe, J. Usage Patterns and Preference for Car Sharing: A Case Study of Dublin. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2021, 9, 253–259.
- Nguyen, Q. Factors Affecting the Willingness to Use Car Sharing Service: A Case Study of Stavanger. Master’s Thesis, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 2020.
- Jochem, P.; Frankenhauser, D.; Ewald, L.; Ensslen, A.; Fromm, H. Does Free-Floating Carsharing Reduce Private Vehicle Ownership? The Case of SHARE NOW in European Cities. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2020, 141, 373–395.
- Verlinghieri, E., 2019. Participating in health: the healthy outcomes of citizen participation in urban and transport planning. In: Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning. Springer, pp. 535–562.
- Le Pira, M., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Pluchino, A., Rapisarda, A., 2016. Modelling stakeholder participation in transport planning. Case Stud Transp Policy 4 (3), 230–238.
- Lusk, A.C., da Silva Filho, D.F., Dobbert, L., 2018. Pedestrian and Cyclist Preferences for Tree Locations by Sidewalks and Cycle Tracks and Associated Benefits: Worldwide Implications from a Study in Boston. MA. Cities.
- Bartels, C., Kolbe-Alexander, T., Behrens, R., Hendricks, S., Lambert, E.V., 2016. Can the use of Bus Rapid Transit lead to a healthier lifestyle in urban South Africa? The SUN Study. J Transp Heal 3 (2), 200–210.
- Schaefers, T. Exploring carsharing usage motives: A hierarchical means-end chain analysis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2013, 47, 69–77.
- Costain, C.; Ardron, C.; Habib, K.N. Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2012, 46, 421–434.
- Dias, F.F.; Lavieri, P.S.; Garikapati, V.M.; Astroza, S.; Pendyala, R.M.; Bhat, C.R. A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services. Transportation 2017, 44, 1307–1323.
- Heinen, E.; Maat, K.; van Wee, B. The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2011, 16, 102–109.
- Heinen, E. Identity and travel behaviour: A cross-sectional study on commute mode choice and intention to change. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2016, 43, 238–253.
- Adelson, R.M.; Fishburn, P.C. Utility Theory for Decision Making; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1970.
- Lois, D.; Moriano, J.A.; Rondinella, G. Cycle commuting intention: A model based on theory of planned behaviour and social identity. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2015, 32, 101–113.
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211.
- Fu, X.; Juan, Z. Understanding public transit use behavior: Integration of the theory of planned behavior and the customer satisfaction theory. Transportation 2016, 44.
- Kim, Y.G.; Woo, E.; Nam, J. Sharing economy perspective on an integrative framework of the NAM and TPB. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 72, 109–117.
- Bhale, U. (2024). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Healthcare.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: (p. 197).
